Worrying Case of Conflicting Legal Interpretation in Nigeria


Although I'm popularly known for my interest in energy analysis and environmental activism, there are moments when I feel the need to also write on key sensitive issues affecting our country Nigeria. And when such moments beckon, I always do so almost immediately, in fact.

One of such key issues which I wish to write about is the current spate of inconsistency in legal interpretation in Nigeria 🇳🇬 It's one delicate issue that's important to and should concern democracy anywhere in the world, when we think of the role and relevance of law in our society.

Why are they conflicting court judgements here and there in Nigeria? I mean even amongst courts of coordinate jurisdiction, why are they several interpretations on similar court cases? Well, I leave that to lawyers and other learned folks to answer.

Normally, interpretations are always a translation of thoughts into words. So long as this be the case, law creates a problem not just for the tried but also for the society as a whole. But because of diverse interpretations by different lawyers and on similar cases, must we allow our society to be thrown into confusion?

No wonder, Prof. M. A. Ajomo; a Professor of International Law during his inaugural lecture at the 1984 convocation ceremonies of the prestigious University of Lagos, said that law itself was mainly an exercise in controversy. I can't agree less.

In the past few days, a verdict was given by Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court siting in Abuja compelling the governor of Ebonyi State - Mr. Dave Umahi and his deputy - Mr. Kelechi Igwe to vacate their offices for defecting from PDP on whose platform they were elected in 2019, to the APC.

Politicians who are in the same situation as Governor Umahi must be rethinking their actions and their possible fate by now.

And suddenly, dusts began to gather everywhere in the country which has caused many senior lawyers to give divergent views on the judgement on radio and TV interviews here and there.

My question remains; Is Justice Ekwo's judgement on the said case not in tandem with extant laws of the land? 

Does it run counter to verdicts of other coordinate jurisdiction on similar cases any time in the past?

With appropriate guiding documents and provisions such as;

  • the Nigerian Constitution
  • The constitution of both PDP and APC, and 
  • the power of Elections Petitions Tribunal, or State House of Assembly on the removal from office of a siting government.

Can you say that the verdict by Justice Inyang Ekwo was wrong? And can you boldly say that those lawyers who side with his verdict on the case are not better lawyers when compared to those who don't?

To avoid controversies like this, and more, we need to stop judiciary inconsistency in Nigeria.

Nigerians need a Judiciary that's consistent in its legal interpretation for the collective good of all. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Mistakes I Made in my Thrift Wears Business

Is the Lagos State Government banning plastics for real?

Four things that make a Digital copy impressive